Why I can't do one night stands (w/Matthew Hussey) / Anna Akana

This is sad. Anna, you are beautiful, charming, funny, articulate, at the very least faiirly intelligent and young - if only you were not perceived as being a gold digger, you'd never have trouble finding a boyfriend. You'd probably have no trouble finding a husband you'd be pleased with. But you had to be materialistic and refuse to see why that is a problem. You can't be selfish in relationships without that selfishness coming back to you.

See: here. That's where the comment should be visible but, not, it isn't, because management just won't admit that something doesn't work.

Trying To Get Yourself “Summer-Ready" / Buzzfeed Violet

"Attention, Anglo-Saxons: the rest of humanity has discovered this thing called "seasoning." When used on food, it makes it more flavorful, with the result that you don't feel the urge to eat quite so much of it, or the need to douse it with sugar or salt as so many of you do (because they are the only two flavoring agents which you seem to feel can be consumed by respectable people) with the result that with many of you it is a race to see whether a heart attack, diabetes or a stroke will take you out, first. You can learn more about this from practically any other culture on the planet, if the people of any of those cultures are still willing to talk to you on this subject, because you've been absolutely insufferable on it for over a century."


See: here. Yes, Google censored this, too, because I guess we're not allowed to say that filling up on large amounts of bad, oversalted, oversweetened food is unhealthy? At least the mindless bot they have doing the ghosting felt so and (of course) no appeal mechanism exists.

NollaGirl504 / New Changes To My Channel, Addressing Trolls / sigma1932

Sigma1932 started his comment with

"In the spirit of reasonable constructive feedback, yeah, I don't doubt there was plenty of anger thrown at you after that Victor Knight situation, but to be fair, you weren't an innocent bystander there due to your reaction. I'd be interested in reading the full discussion if there's more than what he's letting on, but AFAIK you deleted his comments... if not, let me know, I'll take another look for them in the comments on the other video on my own time."

and then more victim blaming nonsense from him followed, to which I tried to reply, only to thwarted by Google, a company which in this case, can be see shielding somebody who was baiting the victim of harassment and death threats from having his nonsense rebutted. This company just gets classier all of the time. My ghosted comment follows:

"Excuse me? There is nothing reasonable about your feedback. I looked up Victor Knight's OWN ACCOUNT of that initial discussion. Even if we take him at his almost certainly worthless word, he got abusive and she got hostile back. There is a world of difference between starting a fight and fighting back; to say otherwise isn't to be constructive, it is to be passive aggressive, as is your suggestion that she unhide the abuse posted by one of your fellow trolls. "How dare you explode after one of my friends baits you" - such typical troll "logic." Victor Knight's version of events can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrXwtjVLmTU "


Linking to where my comment should be visible

See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVmOK3th0-s&lc=z12agjvzjqvtdhrrx04cgtkzzqr3gnn4jmg0k

As I keep saying, self-regulation has failed in the case of the Internet. One can't even explain Google's actions in terms of rational (if unprincipled) greed. The staff is being evil, just for the sake of being evil.

NollaGirl504 / New Changes To My Channel, Addressing Trolls / Reply to Lowspeed01

In response to a comment about the user "Angry MGTOW" in which somebody said

"How this guy has followers at all I'll never know."

I wrote

"As one of the guy's former followers, I can give one answer - curiosity about what was going through this guy's mind. I think I got an answer a few weeks ago when he posted a video in which he asked his audience if he should have sex with another MGTOW called "Turd Flinging Monkey", talking about how he'd like to have TFM lick peanut butter off of his penis, going on with this fantasy for longer than I was willing to listen. Shortly after that he did a video in which he sounded like he was near the point of emotional collapse over the fact that TFM didn't want to talk to him any more."

As usual, I link directly to the portion of the discussion in which my comment should be visible, and as you can see, it has been ghosted. Why? Because Google feels like it, that's why.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVmOK3th0-s&lc=z13tw1z4bmf2tzwl123wu3gyaqqasxhls

Amy Schumer and Amber Rose Go All in on Masturbation Jokes / Nicolas Costas

+Nicholas An adult woman should feel obligated to obey her mere sibling? I've never heard of such a thing, though I have heard of premarital sex happening in Greece, so so much for "slutty" American women. What if a woman turns out to have better judgment than her brother (and I've seen that happen many times)? Should she be forced to go along with his bad decisions, merely because she was born without a penis? That's absurd.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cue9frSM6EY&lc=z13kslawxtbnfhdto22twt0ogqnfyzy03

10 Most Mind-Blowing Discoveries In The Last Year

Planet Nine - this is inaccurate. Batygin and Brown wrote a paper speculating about the existence of a ninth planet, based on the distribution of comets in the solar system (if I recall correctly), but the planet remains (as they said briefly) hypothetical; it has not been found. Anybody doubting this is invited to do a search under "Konstatin Batygin" "Michael Brown" like this one: https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22Konstatin+Batygin%22+%22Michael+Brown%22 - the planet has not yet been found, and there is some doubt as to its existence. See:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4ccbdNei68&lc=z13qtz5b4kvbyzqel22mj5bxmkvafrf1k

Can We Talk About Trump? / Just Between Us

Can we talk about Trump? Sure, Gaby, why not? Aside from the fact that you'll block me. :)

So-called "liberals" like you and Allison showered the poor with contempt for years. You did some of that on this channel, and some of us criticized that choice, explained to you why Classism was an offensive display of ignorance, getting nothing but trolling and arrogance in return. We told you that people were going to get angry, really angry about this sort of attitude, but did you or other people like you listen? No. Good little rich kids that you were, you thought you could say or do anything you wanted to, and there would never be any consequences because people like you would always be in control. But there are always consequences.

Does Trump genuinely care about the poor? Probably not, but unlike you two, he at least paid lip service to the notion that somebody should and that's why he won. So many people were so desperate to find a candidate who cared whether or not they had a fair chance at survival that they were blinded to the obvious fact that Trump is a huckster and that hucksters do not keep their promises. If you think things are ugly now, just wait a year or two, when the electorate sees that Trump didn't care about the poor any more than Clinton did. Or you two probably ever will, unless the poor are of the right color or otherwise fashionable. Is some pale skinned straight guy in Missouri starving to death because nobody will hire him, no matter how solid his credentials are? People like you either won't care or worse, will find pleasure in his suffering, and then wonder why they are hated by people like him.

Empathy, Gaby. If you can't cultivate it, at least learn how to fake it and when you manage that, teach Allison, because I don't think you're going to like the alternative. You two claim to be part French. I'm sure you're heard of the Revolution. Push the poor enough and they will push back. If nothing changes, everything will. Leaders far worse than Trump will arise, if the people aren't offered a better alternative, one that they can endure. If the elected thugs fail to produce results, volunteer thugs will always be available. Random violence as a form of guerrilla warfare would be a highly effective choice for an oppressed underclass. The rich don't have the numbers needed to long endure a war of attrition. Sooner or later, the underclass will figure that out, because random violence is a natural, instinct driven response to a thwarted search for justice. Let the rioters discover that the murders they're committing are usually not being solved, and there will be more of them. Blood would end up flowing through the streets, and some of that blood is likely to be your own, either way, whether due to your execution by a thuggish future American government or your death at the hands of somebody who has been maddened by his circumstances.

Is that the future you want? I ask, because it's the future you're helping to make. If the masses start to riot, do you really think you'll be able to escape with as much face recognition as you already have? You'll be lucky to get as far as Long Beach without being caught. I can already picture Allison dangling from a noose, a tear running from her eye, her last thoughts being of Mexico, to which she had hoped you could both flee. As if there would even be any hope for Mexico, if America were to go Fascist. In this scenario, you both fail in your effort to flee to a country doomed to soon be destroyed. That thought makes me sad, not for you two, but for the Mexican people, who deserve far better.

I could add that after that, things get a lot worse, but I'm wondering, am I at all getting through to you? Is there any way to get past that bulletproof attitude of yours? Aside, I mean, from the actual use of a bullet? My three year old niece can understand the notion that her actions have an impact on others. Why, at 28, do you have so much trouble understanding the same thing? You can not act in a way that helps the thugs into power, and then morally separate yourself from the consequences.



See : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGMhdmhAd2A&lc=z12kjtghppujyx34l04cedwozqe3gtixga0